inter census period 1993 - 2007 grew at 0.79%, where the southern provinces (Luya, Chachapoyas, Amazonas and Rodríguez de Mendoza) grew 0.91%, while the northern provinces grew at rates of 0.71%.
not true then the thesis that says that the people of South moved north. This is reinforced by the 2007 Census data, which points to 0.43% (954 persons) of the population living in the northern provinces, 5 years ago lived in the southern provinces, while 1.04% (1582 persons) of those living in the southern provinces, for 5 years lived in the northern provinces.
This does not necessarily mean flow direction is from north to south, but definitely confirms that the demographic trend movement is from south to north. Is attributed to the road Chiclayo - Bagua as a reason for why people would move from south to north. But this is not satisfied.
Seeking to find the general pattern of internal growth in the region, another look to see the pace of growth is seeing the movement from rural to city. From rural to urban.
The INEI census information on your website are not the results of the distribution of population by 1993 census areas. However we find a secondary source, in which however there are thousands rounded data, but just take it to see the trend.
On this basis shows that the region's urban population has grown at an annual rate of 2.37% as opposed to rural growth rate showed a negative rate of -0.24%
The variations provincial level shows that Condorcanqui shows a higher rate of urban growth, more than 6%. Utcubamba and Bongará followed with about 3.5%, after Rodriguez de Mendoza and Chachapoyas with more than 2%, Bagua with more than 1% and finally Luya with just 0.62%.
On the side of the rural population reduction occurs in Chachapoyas, Luya, Bagua and Utcubamba. While the most significant increase recorded in Condorcanqui where the rate of growth of the rural population is more than 2%.
From the foregoing it may raise ideas and questions to be resolved. First we are checking on a few political and administrative conditions (which define the territorial boundaries current) would be conditions on the population movement in the region. The territorial constituencies in terms of administrative policy does not greatly influence the displacement of the population. So what impact will the land management policies under the same provincial constituencies?
Second, the movement of the southern provinces - North and vice versa show no significance to mention that there is a shift to the region north of the main departure point for the region to the coast. It appears that migration does not occur in the region intraprovincial being bound and Utcubamba Bagua. In
Third, the migration from the countryside to small towns, rural to urban does show a trend towards urban concentration. Here comes the questions: How is changing agriculture employs nearly 70% of the population? What are the activities that are absorbing inner-city labor or is that farming is managed from these small towns?
Fourthly, is the greatest civility is meaning better conditions for the population? Resolving this question involves mainly economic issues. Well, small towns and their economic attractiveness attract better people to migrate to the city, But why leave the field? What changed in the field to decide to go to town? Because I know what attracts the city, but we also know what happens on the field.
The reader will be outlining what are the answers. But apparently there's more of a variable to identify demographic dynamics. See more
0 comments:
Post a Comment